As far as using photos to enhance a video of a static scene, wouldn't the use of high-definition video accomplish the same goal without all the complexities of blending multiple photographs into a seamless panoramic shot of the set/scene you want to shoot?
As far as using photos to enhance a video of a static scene, wouldn't the use of high-definition video accomplish the same goal without all the complexities of blending multiple photographs into a seamless panoramic shot of the set/scene you want to shoot?
hope everyone is having a decent thursday- i'm excited: we're gonna do a live show from this year's LA Irish Film Fest :) http://is.gd/eMqTg40 mins ago
tired of the hype over the new Apple products? here's something different -thoughts on Roberto Rossellini’s War Trilogy http://is.gd/ePIHW1 day ago
6 responses so far.
1 Phil // Sep 2, 2008 at 6:18 am
I was told there would be no math….
As far as using photos to enhance a video of a static scene, wouldn't the use of high-definition video accomplish the same goal without all the complexities of blending multiple photographs into a seamless panoramic shot of the set/scene you want to shoot?
2 kiley // Sep 2, 2008 at 6:21 am
The next step in cinema's evolution?
3 jettloe // Sep 2, 2008 at 6:51 am
HiDef vs. Stills
4 Phil // Sep 2, 2008 at 1:18 pm
I was told there would be no math….
As far as using photos to enhance a video of a static scene, wouldn't the use of high-definition video accomplish the same goal without all the complexities of blending multiple photographs into a seamless panoramic shot of the set/scene you want to shoot?
5 kiley // Sep 2, 2008 at 1:21 pm
The next step in cinema's evolution?
6 Jett Loe // Sep 2, 2008 at 1:51 pm
HiDef vs. Stills
Leave a Comment