<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Film Talk &#8211; Part 27 &#8211; Hancock is Wanted!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/</link>
	<description>Los Angeles Based Award Winning Movie Review Podcast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:55:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Film Talk &#187; Upcoming Films - Part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator>The Film Talk &#187; Upcoming Films - Part 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 14:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=62#comment-485</guid>
		<description>[...] my, has the season of films such as Wanted and the Mummy come to a close for another year? Will we at last be able to watch some films made [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] my, has the season of films such as Wanted and the Mummy come to a close for another year? Will we at last be able to watch some films made [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jett Loe</title>
		<link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=62#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Cheers for the tip iremonger - had a look and I hadn&#039;t &#039;flipped a switch&#039; on Libsyn properly! 

+ glad ya like the new look of the site: we&#039;re also on &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://twitter.com/thefilmtalk&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Twitter&lt;/A&gt; and &lt;a HREF=&quot;http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=29562546279&amp;ref=mf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Facebook&lt;/A&gt;.

It&#039;s an experiment - we&#039;ll see if the Dear Listener is interested in what Gareth and I are up to and interested in reviewing movies as well on Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cheers for the tip iremonger &#8211; had a look and I hadn&#8217;t &#8216;flipped a switch&#8217; on Libsyn properly! </p>
<p>+ glad ya like the new look of the site: we&#8217;re also on <a HREF="http://twitter.com/thefilmtalk" rel="nofollow">Twitter</a> and <a HREF="http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=29562546279&#038;ref=mf" rel="nofollow">Facebook</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s an experiment &#8211; we&#8217;ll see if the Dear Listener is interested in what Gareth and I are up to and interested in reviewing movies as well on Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iremonger</title>
		<link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>iremonger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=62#comment-232</guid>
		<description>I thought I should let you know that this episode hasn&#039;t shown up on the RSS feed yet. Loving the show and the new look!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I should let you know that this episode hasn&#8217;t shown up on the RSS feed yet. Loving the show and the new look!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jett Loe</title>
		<link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 13:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=62#comment-231</guid>
		<description>You know - I&#039;d say both!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know &#8211; I&#8217;d say both!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Higgins</title>
		<link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 06:39:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=62#comment-228</guid>
		<description>i picked up the phrase from someone else - who compared film artists to cinematic industrialists in an article about brett ratner and brian singer.  can you guess which is which?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i picked up the phrase from someone else &#8211; who compared film artists to cinematic industrialists in an article about brett ratner and brian singer.  can you guess which is which?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jett Loe</title>
		<link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=62#comment-227</guid>
		<description>&#039;cinematic industrialists&#039; is a nice turn of phrase.

Cinema has been industrial for a long time - but now w/flip cams and youtube - it can be something else - almost weightless maybe...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;cinematic industrialists&#8217; is a nice turn of phrase.</p>
<p>Cinema has been industrial for a long time &#8211; but now w/flip cams and youtube &#8211; it can be something else &#8211; almost weightless maybe&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Higgins</title>
		<link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=62#comment-226</guid>
		<description>PS: Not that I want anyone&#039;s career ruined.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS: Not that I want anyone&#8217;s career ruined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gareth Higgins</title>
		<link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>Gareth Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 09:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=62#comment-225</guid>
		<description>James McAvoy will be perfectly fine - he&#039;s talented and good-looking; the problem for me is that &#039;Wanted&#039; will not ruin anyone&#039;s career.  Because it&#039;s just the kind of film that cinematic industrialists love to make.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James McAvoy will be perfectly fine &#8211; he&#8217;s talented and good-looking; the problem for me is that &#8216;Wanted&#8217; will not ruin anyone&#8217;s career.  Because it&#8217;s just the kind of film that cinematic industrialists love to make.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jett Loe</title>
		<link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Jett Loe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=62#comment-224</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a terrible horrible awful ugly film in all dimensions.  As for McAvoy = he&#039;ll be fine! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a terrible horrible awful ugly film in all dimensions.  As for McAvoy = he&#8217;ll be fine! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenny</title>
		<link>http://www.thefilmtalk.com/2008/07/12/the-film-talk-part-27-hancock-is-wanted/comment-page-1/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 19:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefilmtalk.com/?p=62#comment-223</guid>
		<description>Sorry (but not surprised) to hear that Wanted is so terrible - I was so excited about James McAvoy after The Last King of Scotland.  Hopefully it&#039;s a blip too small to ruin the lad&#039;s career.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry (but not surprised) to hear that Wanted is so terrible &#8211; I was so excited about James McAvoy after The Last King of Scotland.  Hopefully it&#8217;s a blip too small to ruin the lad&#8217;s career.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
